H
Healthboard

Target Heart Rate Calculator

By Healthboard Editorial TeamLast reviewed

Your details

years
bpm

Count your pulse for 60 seconds after waking, before getting up. Used only by the Karvonen method.

Method

Result

115–139bpm
Moderate-intensity target

A 25-year-old with a resting heart rate of 65 bpm has a moderate-intensity target heart rate of 115–139 bpm and a vigorous-intensity target of 140–177 bpm, using the Karvonen (heart rate reserve) method and an estimated maximum heart rate of 191 bpm (Tanaka: 208 − 0.7 × age). Following the American College of Sports Medicine, moderate is 40–59% and vigorous is 60–89% of heart rate reserve.

Estimated max heart rate
191 bpm
Tanaka 208 − 0.7 × age; 220 − age gives 195
Moderate (40–59%)
115–139 bpm
You can talk, but not sing
Vigorous (60–89%)
140–177 bpm
Only a few words before pausing for breath
Resting heart rate
65 bpm
Heart rate reserve 126 bpm

Training zones (% of heart rate reserve)

ZoneIntensityHeart rate (bpm)
1 — Very light50–60%128–140
2 — Light60–70%140–153
3 — Aerobic70–80%153–165
4 — Threshold80–90%165–178
5 — Maximum90–100%178–191

Maximum heart rate by formula

Tanaka (2001)208 − 0.7 × age — used here
191 bpm
Traditional220 − age — underestimates in older adults
195 bpm

Beta-blockers and some other heart and blood pressure medicines lower heart rate and blunt its rise with exercise, so these targets will not apply. The same is true in pregnancy and for anyone with a heart condition — ask your clinician for a target, or use perceived exertion or the talk test instead.

The five-zone split and its names are a common training convention, not part of the ACSM moderate and vigorous definitions, and different devices draw the zones differently.

Any age-based maximum is an average. An individual's true maximum can sit around 10 bpm or more above or below the prediction, and only a supervised maximal exercise test measures it directly.

Your target heart rate is the pulse range that corresponds to a chosen exercise intensity. It starts from an estimate of your maximum heart rate, which falls with age, and takes a percentage of it — either of the maximum itself or, with the Karvonen method, of the gap between your resting and maximum rates. This calculator estimates the maximum with the Tanaka formula rather than the older 220 minus age.

What it gives
Moderate and vigorous exercise heart rate ranges
Max heart rate
Tanaka: 208 − 0.7 × age
Methods
Karvonen (heart rate reserve) or percent of maximum
Inputs
Age, resting heart rate, method
Intensity bands (ACSM)
Moderate 40–59% HRR or 64–76% HRmax; vigorous 60–89% HRR or 77–95% HRmax

Formula

Tanaka 2001 maximum heart rate with the Karvonen (heart rate reserve) method

HRmax = 208 − 0.7 × age; Karvonen target = (HRmax − HRrest) × intensity + HRrest; percent-of-max target = HRmax × intensity

HRmax
— Estimated maximum heart rate, beats per minute
HRrest
— Resting heart rate, beats per minute
HRmax − HRrest
— Heart rate reserve
intensity
— Fraction of effort, e.g. 0.5 for 50%
age
— Age in years

Tanaka, Monahan and Seals pooled 351 studies covering 18,712 people and confirmed the result in a laboratory study of 514 healthy adults. They found that 220 − age underestimates maximum heart rate in older adults, and that the relationship did not differ between men and women or with habitual activity. Karvonen is the default because it uses your resting heart rate, so targets reflect your own working range. Intensity cut-offs come from the American College of Sports Medicine's 2011 position stand, which gives separate percentages for each method — 40–59% of reserve and 64–76% of maximum both describe moderate effort.

Target Heart Rate Calculator examples

Worked Target Heart Rate Calculator examples with their results
InputResultCategory
Age 25, resting 65, Karvonen115–139 bpmModerate-intensity target
Age 40, resting 70, Karvonen114–135 bpmModerate-intensity target
Age 40, percent of max115–137 bpmModerate-intensity target
Age 55, resting 60, Karvonen104–125 bpmModerate-intensity target
Age 65, percent of max104–124 bpmModerate-intensity target
Age 70, resting 75, Karvonen109–125 bpmModerate-intensity target

What is a target heart rate?

Heart rate rises in step with how hard you are working, which makes it a convenient, real-time gauge of exercise intensity. A target heart rate is simply the range of beats per minute that corresponds to the intensity you are aiming for — usually moderate or vigorous aerobic activity.

This calculator uses the American College of Sports Medicine's definitions, which depend on the method. With the Karvonen method, moderate intensity is 40–59% of heart rate reserve and vigorous is 60–89%. With the percent-of-max method, moderate is 64–76% of maximum heart rate and vigorous is 77–95%.

You may also see simpler round figures: the American Heart Association's consumer guidance describes moderate exercise as about 50–70% and vigorous as about 70–85% of maximum heart rate. Both are reasonable guides; the ACSM figures are used here because they are defined for each method, so the two methods can be compared fairly.

The ranges are a guide, not a rule. A heart rate monitor or a 15-second pulse count multiplied by four tells you where you are, and you adjust pace until you sit in the band you want.

How do you calculate maximum heart rate by age?

Maximum heart rate cannot be measured safely at home, so it is estimated from age. The best-known estimate is 220 minus age, but it was never validated in a sample with enough older adults. In 2001 Tanaka and colleagues analysed data from 18,712 people and arrived at 208 − 0.7 × age, which this calculator uses.

Estimated maximum heart rate by formula
AgeTanaka (208 − 0.7 × age)Traditional (220 − age)
20194 bpm200 bpm
30187 bpm190 bpm
40180 bpm180 bpm
50173 bpm170 bpm
60166 bpm160 bpm
70159 bpm150 bpm

The two agree at 40 and diverge on either side. At 70 the traditional formula gives a maximum nine beats lower, which pulls every training target down with it and means an older exerciser following it may be working less hard than intended.

Either way, the result is an average for people of your age. Individuals vary around it — by around 10 bpm or more — and only a supervised maximal exercise test measures your true maximum.

What is the Karvonen formula, and is it better than percent of max?

The Karvonen method, from Karvonen and colleagues' 1957 study of the effects of training on heart rate, works on heart rate reserve: the difference between your maximum and your resting rate. You take a percentage of that reserve and add your resting rate back on.

Because it starts from your resting pulse, it gives a fitter person with a low resting rate a target matched to their own working range. The simpler percent-of-max method ignores resting heart rate entirely, and for the same percentage it gives lower numbers. That is why the two methods use different cut-offs: 60% of reserve and 60% of maximum are different efforts.

Same person, two methods, ACSM cut-offs (age 40, resting heart rate 70 bpm)
IntensityPercent of maxKarvonen
Moderate64–76%: 115–137 bpm40–59%: 114–135 bpm
Vigorous77–95%: 139–171 bpm60–89%: 136–168 bpm

With matched cut-offs the two methods land close together for a typical resting heart rate. They part ways when resting heart rate is unusually low or high, which is where Karvonen's personalisation earns its keep.

To use Karvonen well you need a genuine resting heart rate: count your pulse for a full minute after waking, before you get out of bed, and average a few mornings.

What are the five heart rate training zones?

Many fitness trackers divide the range from 50% to 100% into five zones of ten percentage points each. The zones and their names are a common training convention rather than part of the ACSM moderate and vigorous definitions. The result panel above lists them in beats per minute for your inputs and chosen method.

  • Zone 1, 50–60%: very light — warm-ups, cool-downs and recovery.
  • Zone 2, 60–70%: light — comfortable, conversational endurance work.
  • Zone 3, 70–80%: aerobic — sustained steady efforts.
  • Zone 4, 80–90%: threshold — hard work you can hold for limited periods.
  • Zone 5, 90–100%: maximum — short intervals only.

Zone boundaries are a convention rather than physiology, and different brands draw them differently. The so-called fat-burning zone is the lower zones relabelled: the share of energy from fat is higher at low intensity, but total calories burned per minute are lower.

When is target heart rate not reliable?

Several common situations make heart rate a poor guide to effort:

  • Beta-blockers and some other heart and blood pressure medicines lower heart rate and blunt its rise during exercise, so age-based targets will be unreachable or misleading.
  • Pregnancy changes resting and exercise heart rate; follow the advice of your maternity care team.
  • Heart conditions, including rhythm disorders such as atrial fibrillation, mean targets should come from your cardiologist or a supervised exercise test.
  • Heat, dehydration, caffeine, illness and poor sleep all raise heart rate for the same effort.
  • Wrist-worn optical sensors can lag or misread during intervals and strength work.

How can you judge exercise intensity without a heart rate monitor?

The CDC describes two simple alternatives that work regardless of medication or device:

  • The talk test: during moderate activity you can talk but not sing; during vigorous activity you can say only a few words before pausing for breath.
  • Perceived exertion: on a 0–10 scale where sitting is 0 and all-out effort is 10, moderate activity is about 5 or 6 and vigorous activity starts at about 7 or 8.

Many people find it useful to calibrate the two: note your heart rate when the talk test says moderate, and use that as a personal check on the calculated range.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good target heart rate for my age?

For a 40-year-old with a resting heart rate of 70, the Karvonen method with ACSM cut-offs gives a moderate target of about 114–135 bpm and a vigorous target of about 136–168 bpm. Your own numbers depend on age, resting heart rate and method, so enter them above for a personal range.

Is 220 minus age accurate?

It is a rough average, and Tanaka's 2001 analysis of 18,712 people found it underestimates maximum heart rate in older adults. The Tanaka formula, 208 − 0.7 × age, gives the same answer at 40 and a higher one above it. Both remain estimates; your true maximum may differ.

Should I use Karvonen or percent of max heart rate?

Karvonen, if you know your resting heart rate. It adjusts targets to your own working range, so a fitter person with a low resting pulse gets more appropriate numbers. Percent of max is simpler and needs only your age. Each method has its own ACSM cut-offs, so never apply one method's percentages to the other.

How do I measure my resting heart rate?

Count your pulse at the wrist or neck for a full 60 seconds after waking, before getting out of bed or having caffeine. Repeat on three or four mornings and average the readings. A wearable's overnight resting value is a reasonable alternative.

Do beta-blockers change my target heart rate?

Yes. Beta-blockers lower resting heart rate and limit how far it rises during exercise, so age-based targets no longer apply. Ask your prescriber or cardiologist for a suitable range, or use the talk test and perceived exertion to judge intensity instead of your pulse.

Is it dangerous to exceed my target heart rate?

For healthy people, briefly going above the range is not usually dangerous — it simply means you are working harder than planned. The range is a guide to intensity, not a safety ceiling. Chest pain, faintness or unusual breathlessness are reasons to stop and seek medical advice.

Sources

  1. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise — Garber CE et al. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (PubMed), 2011
  2. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited — Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR. Journal of the American College of Cardiology (PubMed), 2001
  3. The effects of training on heart rate; a longitudinal study — Karvonen MJ et al. Annales Medicinae Experimentalis et Biologiae Fenniae (PubMed), 1957
  4. How to Measure Physical Activity Intensity — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025